Important Notice

Subject to any applicable law that cannot be excluded, no reliance should be placed on any information on this website. You agree that Evonite is not liable for any action you take, omission, or decision you make in reliance on this website, subject to applicable law.

This website is not directed at, or intended for, retail clients as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority. It is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

This website is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice and should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. The website is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy and do not constitute an invitation or inducement of any sort to any person. This website contains purely factual information and is not intended to promote any form of investment opportunity. Accordingly, this presentation is not a financial promotion within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Please note that the performance information contained on this website relates to investment vehicles which were managed by teams including Evonite team members and other individuals who have not joined Evonite. Accordingly, Evonite is not representing that the Evonite team members were solely responsible for the performance information. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.

Evonite LLP is an appointed representative of Langham Hall Fund Management LLP, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the UK.

This website collects cookies to deliver a better user experience; we never collect personal data. For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.

Evonite Logo

09 | 03 | 26

Popularity is not opportunity

José Pellicer​, Partner, Strategy

Popularity is not opportunity

The INREV Investor Intentions Survey is usually read as a guide to where capital wants to go next. That is useful, but also incomplete. Read differently, the survey works better as a thermometer than a map. It tells us where momentum is building - and, just as importantly, where markets may already be running hot.


Momentum is not the same as opportunity.  When a market benefits from momentum, it means that it is at (say) 08:00 to 09:00 o’clock - still growing, but the best opportunity has passed.


When the survey shows a sector or market that moves sharply up the rankings for the first time after a period of relative neglect, it does not reflect an opportunity.  It just reflects momentum.  In other words,  the majority of investors have accepted that someone has got hold of the opportunity, but there is still some growth to enjoy.


By contrast when a sector or a country has sat at the top of investor preferences for several years, the real opportunity is typically already behind us. Pricing has adjusted, competition has intensified, and incremental capital is no longer being paid for risk. In those cases, popularity should be interpreted cautiously (i.e. the market is at 10.00 o’clock or later).


Residential real estate illustrates this distinction clearly.  It has been Europe’s preferred sector ( amongst the top 2) for several years and remains firmly at the top of the survey.  That persistence should prompt questions rather than comfort. Prime residential yields of around 3.5% sit only marginally above long-dated bond yields of roughly 3%.  The spread is thin, and the duration risk is substantial: some upside, but meaningful downside if rates, regulation, or sentiment move against you.


Political intervention compounds that risk. Housing has become a social and electoral issue across much of Europe, and governments have responded with rent controls, tenant protections, taxation changes and planning restrictions. When something has been the favourite for too long, it is a hotspot.


 Development, by contrast, has moved in the opposite direction. Long avoided due to cost inflation higher rates and some financing constraints, it has climbed rapidly up investor preference rankings. That move suggests momentum rather than overheating. Prime office rents are growing in selected markets, construction costs - while high - have stabilised, and the real estate debt market has returned in force. Financing is available again.


This does not make development a contrarian strategy (the pipeline is not negligeable in some big cities). It means that development is gaining momentum.


The same logic applies when looking at preferred countries. But first, we need to accept that country rankings need to be interpreted relative to market size. Large markets will always sit near the top of investor preferences because they can absorb capital at scale. Their prominence is not a signal of heat; it is a function of depth.


 The UK and Germany are Europe’s largest institutional real estate markets, so should expect them at the top. So should France.


The more interesting signals sit further down the list. Ireland and Denmark stand out precisely because they are not perennial favourites. Both have jumped sharply up investor rankings after years in the second tier. Another momentum signal.


Ireland is a case in point. Prime residential yields are around 4.8% and prime office yields are close to 5%. These look interesting in a European context. These are not distressed levels, but they still allow room for error. Debt is available and capital is returning. A momentum market.


France, by contrast, looks almost dull in the survey. That is precisely why it deserves attention. In relative terms, it appears to be a laggard. Why? High vacancy? Political uncertainty? High government and corporate debt?   Low yields? High development? If you believe all of this, look again and research the market. I am doing it already.


The INREV survey is not what it seems. But it is nonetheless valuable in an unusual way – it shows us where it is hot, where there is momentum and where we should research further.